The Durbin Amendment Explained - NerdWallet
Advertiser Disclosure

The Durbin Amendment Explained

The Durbin Amendment Explained Story

Every time you swipe your debit card, you draw into play the Durbin Amendment — a law that costs consumers an estimated $4 billion annually.

The amendment, part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, sharply lowered debit card interchange fees — charges that stores pay banks when a customer makes a purchase. Supporters said the measure, sponsored by Democratic U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, would lower prices for consumers by cutting retailers’ costs.

But when the rules took effect in 2011, big banks started recouping lost revenue — $14 billion a year, according to a 2014 Federal Reserve paper. Consumers faced increased fees and a reduction in perks, such as debit card rewards programs and free checking.

Opponents, such as banks and credit unions, have said the law actually has hurt consumers overall and hasn’t resulted in lower retail prices. A study from the George Mason University law school determined that retail prices didn’t drop after the law passed.

But supporters, including retail trade groups like the Merchant Payments Coalition and the Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, say that prices have dropped and that there should be more swipe-fee changes. The amendment didn’t affect credit card interchange fees, for instance. These trade groups have made reducing credit card transaction fees a high priority, even as they push for further curbs on debit card costs.

Effects on consumers

After the Durbin measure went into effect, fees on deposit accounts increased an average of 3% to 5%. The increases consumers faced included:

  • Monthly account maintenance charges (with higher minimum balance requirements to avoid those monthly charges).
  • Insufficient-funds fees.
  • Inactivity fees.

Banks also cut back on debit card rewards programs. In their place, banks added more rewards to credit cards, which weren’t covered by the Durbin Amendment.

Some experts say that the amendment has slowed the transition to EMV debit cards, which hold microprocessors that make transactions more secure.

How to get better bank rewards

Because the amendment doesn’t regulate swipe fees for credit cards or prepaid debit cards, banks now offer more rewards options for credit cards. To earn these rewards, consider using a credit card for most of your purchases. This approach works best if you pay your balance in full every month. Otherwise, the interest you pay may offset the value of any rewards.

You could also consider switching to a better checking account. The Durbin Amendment exempts financial institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, which excludes most community banks and credit unions. Many smaller institutions still offer free checking, and some still provide debit card rewards.

Effects on small retailers

  • Some retailers are paying less in debit card swipe fees. Before the amendment, retailers paid an average of 44 cents for a typical debit card transaction, then valued at roughly $38. The Durbin rules meant that for that typical $38 purchase, the maximum fee would be about 24 cents, 45% less than the average cost before the law took effect.
  • Merchants that regularly process smaller debit card purchases may have seen costs rise sharply. Before the amendment, many banks and card issuers based transaction fees on a variable percentage of the purchase value, so merchants paid smaller fees on smaller purchases and larger fees on larger purchases.

    But after the rules took effect, Visa and MasterCard began charging the maximum amount for smaller transactions. So, for example, instead of paying a 6-cent interchange fee for a $3.50 charge for coffee and a doughnut, a shop owner suddenly faced a fee of 22 cents for the same bill.
  • Merchants have fewer free business checking accounts to choose from, as many banks eliminated them to help recoup revenue losses. But according to the Fed paper, banks have recouped less than a third of lost swipe fee revenue.

The Durbin Amendment benefited many larger merchants, however, especially those that sell big-ticket items, as it cut the average swipe fee they pay almost in half. But it remains unclear whether savings have been passed on to consumers. Knowing the amendment’s effects on banks and rewards programs can help you make smart decisions about how you use your cards.

Margarette Burnette is a staff writer at NerdWallet, a personal finance website. Email: mburnette@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @margarette.

Updated Aug. 26, 2015.


Image via iStock.

  • Pingback: Visa is charged up, despite taking some hits »()

  • Jeff

    Great post! This is the best explanation I’ve read.
    I’m sure that the merchants will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.

  • http://blog.sekurecardservices.com/ Jeff

    Great post! This is the best explanation I’ve read.
    I’m sure that the merchants will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.

  • Miguel

    Great Read! But I would not believe anything that comes from an exec in Wal-Mart. They are the negative examples in most business text books on business practices!

  • Miguel

    Great Read! But I would not believe anything that comes from an exec in Wal-Mart. They are the negative examples in most business text books on business practices!

  • Miguel

    Great Read! But I would not believe anything that comes from an exec in Wal-Mart. They are the negative examples in most business text books on business practices!

  • Funancials

    This is a fantastic explanation from all sides.

  • Funancials

    This is a fantastic explanation from all sides.

  • Funancials

    This is a fantastic explanation from all sides.

  • Funancials

    This is a fantastic explanation from all sides.

  • Pingback: Visa Is Charged Up For The Olympics And Riding The Global Demand For Plastic - Forbes()

  • Pingback: How Has Dodd-Frank Impacted Your Checking Account?()

  • Pingback: Google Money Hole? « koinslot()

  • Russ

    Like practically every analysis I have read, this one completely ignores what is actually the core of the problem, at least for small to mid-sized merchants, and what the Durbin amendment fails to address. The credit card associations, Visa/MasterCard/Discover, and the banks which issue the cards are not the only players in this game. It is the third player, the credit card processor, that is often responsible for most of the abuse.
    When you make a purchase with your credit card and the merchant swipes your card, the transaction is sent to a processor who authorizes (or declines) the transaction and sends it to your bank which then pays the merchant, minus fees. I am a sales agent for such a processor. I visit merchants and ask them to use my company’s services rather than the services of one of my competitors. There are 2 pricing models used by processors. One is called “buy rate” in which the processor jacks up the credit card association’s rate on each transaction. This model lacks transparency because when the mercant sees his statement he has no idea what portion of the is going to which entity. The second model is called “pass through” in which the actual association fees are charged on every transaction and a mark-up is added at the end of the statement so the merchant can see what he is paying to the processor. My company uses the pass through model.
    I am looking at comparisons I have done for 2 merchants who had no clue what they were paying to their processors. The first has credit card sales of $20,439.84 and is paying $600.14 in fees, or 2.94%. The actual fees to the associations and banks are $315.20 and his processor additional fees are $284.94. Remember, the processor is increasing the rate on each transaction so it is impossible for the merchant to see theses charges. Our company will pass through the $315.20 and add fees and mark-up of $84.08 for a total of $399.28 or 1.95%.
    The second comparison is even more dramatic. The merchant has credit card sales of $9858.68. The actual association and bank fees are $193.92 which his processor has increased by $391.45 for a total of $585.17 or 5.94%. We would charge only the $193.92 pluss fees and mark-up of $65.94 for a total of $259.86 or 2.64%.

    • http://www.facebook.com/karen.s.wells Karen Simpson Wells

      Would like to talk to you about processing fees. We are a small B & B !

      • Merchant Advocate

        Hi Karen, CardPaymentAdvocates.com supports True Interchange “Pass Through” Pricing. Our mark-up is only 0.25% + $.10/transaction

    • Bonnie

      So, even your processor company ends up charging a business with smaller credit card sales a larger percentage than a business with greater credit cards sales? That is the keystone of the problem in this country.

    • Hug Me….

      looks like a buy rate if I ever saw one…

  • Russ

    Like practically every analysis I have read, this one completely ignores what is actually the core of the problem, at least for small to mid-sized merchants, and what the Durbin amendment fails to address. The credit card associations, Visa/MasterCard/Discover, and the banks which issue the cards are not the only players in this game. It is the third player, the credit card processor, that is often responsible for most of the abuse.
    When you make a purchase with your credit card and the merchant swipes your card, the transaction is sent to a processor who authorizes (or declines) the transaction and sends it to your bank which then pays the merchant, minus fees. I am a sales agent for such a processor. I visit merchants and ask them to use my company’s services rather than the services of one of my competitors. There are 2 pricing models used by processors. One is called “buy rate” in which the processor jacks up the credit card association’s rate on each transaction. This model lacks transparency because when the mercant sees his statement he has no idea what portion of the is going to which entity. The second model is called “pass through” in which the actual association fees are charged on every transaction and a mark-up is added at the end of the statement so the merchant can see what he is paying to the processor. My company uses the pass through model.
    I am looking at comparisons I have done for 2 merchants who had no clue what they were paying to their processors. The first has credit card sales of $20,439.84 and is paying $600.14 in fees, or 2.94%. The actual fees to the associations and banks are $315.20 and his processor additional fees are $284.94. Remember, the processor is increasing the rate on each transaction so it is impossible for the merchant to see theses charges. Our company will pass through the $315.20 and add fees and mark-up of $84.08 for a total of $399.28 or 1.95%.
    The second comparison is even more dramatic. The merchant has credit card sales of $9858.68. The actual association and bank fees are $193.92 which his processor has increased by $391.45 for a total of $585.17 or 5.94%. We would charge only the $193.92 pluss fees and mark-up of $65.94 for a total of $259.86 or 2.64%.

  • Russ

    Like practically every analysis I have read, this one completely ignores what is actually the core of the problem, at least for small to mid-sized merchants, and what the Durbin amendment fails to address. The credit card associations, Visa/MasterCard/Discover, and the banks which issue the cards are not the only players in this game. It is the third player, the credit card processor, that is often responsible for most of the abuse.
    When you make a purchase with your credit card and the merchant swipes your card, the transaction is sent to a processor who authorizes (or declines) the transaction and sends it to your bank which then pays the merchant, minus fees. I am a sales agent for such a processor. I visit merchants and ask them to use my company’s services rather than the services of one of my competitors. There are 2 pricing models used by processors. One is called “buy rate” in which the processor jacks up the credit card association’s rate on each transaction. This model lacks transparency because when the mercant sees his statement he has no idea what portion of the is going to which entity. The second model is called “pass through” in which the actual association fees are charged on every transaction and a mark-up is added at the end of the statement so the merchant can see what he is paying to the processor. My company uses the pass through model.
    I am looking at comparisons I have done for 2 merchants who had no clue what they were paying to their processors. The first has credit card sales of $20,439.84 and is paying $600.14 in fees, or 2.94%. The actual fees to the associations and banks are $315.20 and his processor additional fees are $284.94. Remember, the processor is increasing the rate on each transaction so it is impossible for the merchant to see theses charges. Our company will pass through the $315.20 and add fees and mark-up of $84.08 for a total of $399.28 or 1.95%.
    The second comparison is even more dramatic. The merchant has credit card sales of $9858.68. The actual association and bank fees are $193.92 which his processor has increased by $391.45 for a total of $585.17 or 5.94%. We would charge only the $193.92 pluss fees and mark-up of $65.94 for a total of $259.86 or 2.64%.

    • http://www.facebook.com/karen.s.wells Karen Simpson Wells

      Would like to talk to you about processing fees. We are a small B & B !

      • Merchant Advocate

        Hi Karen, CardPaymentAdvocates.com supports True Interchange “Pass Through” Pricing. Our mark-up is only 0.25% + $.10/transaction

    • Bonnie

      So, even your processor company ends up charging a business with smaller credit card sales a larger percentage than a business with greater credit cards sales? That is the keystone of the problem in this country.

    • Hug Me….

      looks like a buy rate if I ever saw one…

  • Pingback: Meritus Blog » Blog Archive » Interchange Industry Surcharge On the Rise()

  • Holly

    Russ, you speak of “our company”. Are you a processing company? I’d be interested in making the switch…thanks for your no-nonsense explanation.

    • Chad

      What type of business are you? Small to medium ?

  • Holly

    Russ, you speak of “our company”. Are you a processing company? I’d be interested in making the switch…thanks for your no-nonsense explanation.

  • Holly

    Russ, you speak of “our company”. Are you a processing company? I’d be interested in making the switch…thanks for your no-nonsense explanation.

    • Chad

      What type of business are you? Small to medium ?

  • Donna

    So I’m a tiny merchant and I was approached recently by a processor saying his company would charge 25c ONLY on each pin debit, and .89% + 8c and 1.39% + 8c on signature debits and signature credits respectively, instead of the 1.29%+10c and up to 2% +10c that I currently pay. My local bank rep. says that’s impossible for him to guarantee because of the interchange fees alone.
    Who do I go with?
    Donna

    • Chad

      Just fyi, it is possible. For Debit anyway. you can still get a lower rate than what your currently paying.

      • Coley

        Trans Tech will cut any rate.

    • Coley

      Trans Tech is offering .59% rate for small businesses and a 1.35% rate with as low as .5 and .15cents per transaction. Feel free to shoot me an email and I will call you with a rep to set you up.

    • http://www.facebook.com/successfulpositivewoman Alice A. Rivera

      It def. is possible… National Processing doesn’t charge you extra “CENTS” per transaction and their prices never fluctuate. I have signed up my business with them. I can get you their info. they can come out to see you at no cost or obligation and the Rep. was super nice!

    • http://www.facebook.com/mash.cusumano Mash Cusumano

      Never really trust the bank because they will always try to benefit from you paying an extra fee. There is an interchange fee that no merchant service company can do anything about, nor banks for that matter. Indeed no one can promise the interchange will not change however, the fee charged by the processing company is what can be set for the life of your business. For instance, I work for Merchant Services Direct and we offer only half a percent (.5%) on any Master Card, Visa or Discover credit card transaction EVERY transaction a flat rate plus .10 cents. For debit we charge NO percentage and only .25 cents per swipe. So yes, we CAN promise to lock your fee to a certain percentage that goes on top of the interchange fees which by the way are not that high, the highest I have witnessed is .8% .

      I Hope this helps.

  • Donna

    So I’m a tiny merchant and I was approached recently by a processor saying his company would charge 25c ONLY on each pin debit, and .89% + 8c and 1.39% + 8c on signature debits and signature credits respectively, instead of the 1.29%+10c and up to 2% +10c that I currently pay. My local bank rep. says that’s impossible for him to guarantee because of the interchange fees alone.
    Who do I go with?
    Donna

  • Donna

    So I’m a tiny merchant and I was approached recently by a processor saying his company would charge 25c ONLY on each pin debit, and .89% + 8c and 1.39% + 8c on signature debits and signature credits respectively, instead of the 1.29%+10c and up to 2% +10c that I currently pay. My local bank rep. says that’s impossible for him to guarantee because of the interchange fees alone.
    Who do I go with?
    Donna

    • Chad

      Just fyi, it is possible. For Debit anyway. you can still get a lower rate than what your currently paying.

      • Coley

        Trans Tech will cut any rate.

    • Coley

      Trans Tech is offering .59% rate for small businesses and a 1.35% rate with as low as .5 and .15cents per transaction. Feel free to shoot me an email and I will call you with a rep to set you up.

    • Alice A. Rivera

      It def. is possible… National Processing doesn’t charge you extra “CENTS” per transaction and their prices never fluctuate. I have signed up my business with them. I can get you their info. they can come out to see you at no cost or obligation and the Rep. was super nice!

    • http://www.facebook.com/mash.cusumano Mash Cusumano

      Never really trust the bank because they will always try to benefit from you paying an extra fee. There is an interchange fee that no merchant service company can do anything about, nor banks for that matter. Indeed no one can promise the interchange will not change however, the fee charged by the processing company is what can be set for the life of your business. For instance, I work for Merchant Services Direct and we offer only half a percent (.5%) on any Master Card, Visa or Discover credit card transaction EVERY transaction a flat rate plus .10 cents. For debit we charge NO percentage and only .25 cents per swipe. So yes, we CAN promise to lock your fee to a certain percentage that goes on top of the interchange fees which by the way are not that high, the highest I have witnessed is .8% .

      I Hope this helps.

  • Chad

    What about a rate of .039% which is wholesale rate. The fact is that as long as a merchant is 75% swipe they can have this rate. This is the same rate the big boys use, ie.. walmart, target ect.

  • Chad

    What about a rate of .039% which is wholesale rate. The fact is that as long as a merchant is 75% swipe they can have this rate. This is the same rate the big boys use, ie.. walmart, target ect.

  • Chad

    What about a rate of .039% which is wholesale rate. The fact is that as long as a merchant is 75% swipe they can have this rate. This is the same rate the big boys use, ie.. walmart, target ect.

  • Pingback: Discover Shows Its Charged Up For Growth - Forbes()

  • Pingback: Dicover Looks Solid As Credit And Direct Banking Business Show Strong Growth |()

  • Pingback: Discover Shows Its Charged Up For Growth | Find Loans Today - All about loans! Find them today! | Debt | Loans | Save money |()

  • Pingback: Discover Shows Its Charged Up For Growth | loanstop.co.uk()

  • http://cardsofwoods.com/ wooden card

    Essential analysis.

  • http://cardsofwoods.com/ wooden card

    Essential analysis.

  • Pingback: Digital Draw - Kishore Jethanandani - Customer Data Gives Banks a New Model()

  • Pingback: “I’ve Been Satisfied since Day One:” An Exclusive Interview with the Plaintiff in Visa-MasterCard Settlement()

  • Pingback: The Power of the Customer in Banking | PFS()

  • Pingback: Even Factoring In Big Growth Visa Looks Full At $150 - Forbes()

  • Pingback: Chip-and-PIN Credit Cards, Part 2 | HomeTravelAgency.com()

  • Pingback: The Durbin Amendment in 2012: Small Community Banks Take a Hit()

  • AhdsPtn

    This is the best explanation I’ve read. I’m sure that the merchants
    will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be
    interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.The second model is called “pass through” in which the actual
    association fees are charged on every transaction and a mark-up is added
    at the end of the statement so the merchant can see what he is paying
    to the processor. My company uses the pass through model.

  • https://www.cardauthorizer.com/merchants-services.html Merchant Services

    This is the best explanation I’ve read. I’m sure that the merchants
    will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be
    interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.The second model is called “pass through” in which the actual
    association fees are charged on every transaction and a mark-up is added
    at the end of the statement so the merchant can see what he is paying
    to the processor. My company uses the pass through model.

  • https://www.cardauthorizer.com/merchants-services.html Merchant Services

    This is the best explanation I’ve read. I’m sure that the merchants
    will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be
    interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.The second model is called “pass through” in which the actual
    association fees are charged on every transaction and a mark-up is added
    at the end of the statement so the merchant can see what he is paying
    to the processor. My company uses the pass through model.

  • Pingback: Regulation You Can and Can't Prepare For()

  • https://www.cardauthorizer.com/merchants-services.html Merchant Services

    I’m sure that the merchants will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.

  • https://www.cardauthorizer.com/merchants-services.html Merchant Services

    I’m sure that the merchants will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.

  • https://www.cardauthorizer.com/merchants-services.html Merchant Services

    I’m sure that the merchants will appreciate the saving that this amendment represents. It will be interesting to see how this will affect consumer purchasing behaviors.

  • Michael

    I work for an ISO connected to First Data, and Interchange + % is not the norm anymore. We offer Tier 1 Fixed Rates through FD. For instance, a customer that is doing $5192.27 in volume, paying $195.24 in fee’s and has an effective rate of 3.76%…I gave her a 1.00% on credit with .18c swipe fee, and 0% for Debit with .28C swipe fee and a 1.9% on all MID / Non Qual…and we came in at $163.37 for processing the same volume, saving the merchant $31.87 a month, $382.46 a year…Big Difference is not only the savings, but now she has FIXED RATES at the percentages above…Anyone paying Interchange + %, needs to move to a Fixed Rate Platform.

    • rgc3

      how is this better than ‘IC+%’.

      • Bill

        Its not better. Interchange +% is the only way to go. When Michael and First Data want tiered pricing, it is they don’t loose money on Debit transactions they want to make it. On average 75% or more people now use their debit card, which with interchange is .05% and .22 cents. When the merchant is on tiered pricing, they don’t get the benefit of the .05% because his tier starts at 1.9% that is paying almost 4xs time rate. Plus, if merchants are paying over .05 cents in processor transaction charges, YOU ARE GETTING RIPPED OFF!

    • Bill

      I guess you forgot to mention the fixed tiered rate was on top of Interchange they are already paying yes? and if most merchants are seeing 75-80% of customers using debit now with an interchange rate of .05% and .22 cents. Please tell me how adding a full 1% on top plus 18 cents transaction costs is helping them? Not to mention all the ISO fees that come along with not going with a Direct Processing company. Once you add a middle man, the prices SKYROCKET. Tiered pricing should be outlawed.

    • paul wooten

      ANYONE using Tiered processing is taking it in the shorts…PERIOD. “MICHAEL” would not last a single minute in a discussion or debate with Interchange experts. He is either an idiot, or brainwashed by his ISO. FIXED TIER processing companies should be outlawed, period, because with most people paying with Debit, the Merchant saves a TON of money if he is using Interchange+ processing instead of tiered. And the sad thing, all these companies using tiered processing, when Durbin was passed, NEVER SAID A WORD to their merchant customers, because no law said they had to inform their customers that they would be getting ripped off if they stayed with Tiered processing.

      WAKE UP MERCHANTS! DEMAND INTERCHANGE PLUS! IF YOU NEED HELP CHOOSING A COMPANY CONTACT ME @ 469-999-5236. I will explain how to get the lowest fees GUARANTEED with a 2-step process I invented and still keep secret.

      Plus, I give you a FREE EMV Terminal and pay your early termination, and also give a CASH REBATE every month when you switch. The EMV fraud-protection terminal will be mandatory, and we give one to you for FREE>

      Call me!

  • Michael

    I work for an ISO connected to First Data, and Interchange + % is not the norm anymore. We offer Tier 1 Fixed Rates through FD. For instance, a customer that is doing $5192.27 in volume, paying $195.24 in fee’s and has an effective rate of 3.76%…I gave her a 1.00% on credit with .18c swipe fee, and 0% for Debit with .28C swipe fee and a 1.9% on all MID / Non Qual…and we came in at $163.37 for processing the same volume, saving the merchant $31.87 a month, $382.46 a year…Big Difference is not only the savings, but now she has FIXED RATES at the percentages above…Anyone paying Interchange + %, needs to move to a Fixed Rate Platform.

  • Michael

    I work for an ISO connected to First Data, and Interchange + % is not the norm anymore. We offer Tier 1 Fixed Rates through FD. For instance, a customer that is doing $5192.27 in volume, paying $195.24 in fee’s and has an effective rate of 3.76%…I gave her a 1.00% on credit with .18c swipe fee, and 0% for Debit with .28C swipe fee and a 1.9% on all MID / Non Qual…and we came in at $163.37 for processing the same volume, saving the merchant $31.87 a month, $382.46 a year…Big Difference is not only the savings, but now she has FIXED RATES at the percentages above…Anyone paying Interchange + %, needs to move to a Fixed Rate Platform.

    • rgc3

      how is this better than ‘IC+%’.

      • Bill

        Its not better. Interchange +% is the only way to go. When Michael and First Data want tiered pricing, it is they don’t loose money on Debit transactions they want to make it. On average 75% or more people now use their debit card, which with interchange is .05% and .22 cents. When the merchant is on tiered pricing, they don’t get the benefit of the .05% because his tier starts at 1.9% that is paying almost 4xs time rate. Plus, if merchants are paying over .05 cents in processor transaction charges, YOU ARE GETTING RIPPED OFF!

    • Bill

      I guess you forgot to mention the fixed tiered rate was on top of Interchange they are already paying yes? and if most merchants are seeing 75-80% of customers using debit now with an interchange rate of .05% and .22 cents. Please tell me how adding a full 1% on top plus 18 cents transaction costs is helping them? Not to mention all the ISO fees that come along with not going with a Direct Processing company. Once you add a middle man, the prices SKYROCKET. Tiered pricing should be outlawed.

    • paul wooten

      ANYONE using Tiered processing is taking it in the shorts…PERIOD. “MICHAEL” would not last a single minute in a discussion or debate with Interchange experts. He is either an idiot, or brainwashed by his ISO. FIXED TIER processing companies should be outlawed, period, because with most people paying with Debit, the Merchant saves a TON of money if he is using Interchange+ processing instead of tiered. And the sad thing, all these companies using tiered processing, when Durbin was passed, NEVER SAID A WORD to their merchant customers, because no law said they had to inform their customers that they would be getting ripped off if they stayed with Tiered processing.

      WAKE UP MERCHANTS! DEMAND INTERCHANGE PLUS! IF YOU NEED HELP CHOOSING A COMPANY CONTACT ME @ 469-999-5236. I will explain how to get the lowest fees GUARANTEED with a 2-step process I invented and still keep secret.

      Plus, I give you a FREE EMV Terminal and pay your early termination, and also give a CASH REBATE every month when you switch. The EMV fraud-protection terminal will be mandatory, and we give one to you for FREE>

      Call me!

  • Pingback: Why Credit Card Companies Need Some Madison Avenue Style - Trantopic()

  • Pingback: The Durbin Amendment Explained by NerdWallet.com | FeeSeeker Blog()

  • Pingback: INTERVIEW: Synchology President Doug Bobenhouse | PaymentEye()

  • Jonathan

    Given that Visa, MC, and most others have rewards tiers, is that outside of the tiered vs. interchange+ argument? I know we are talking about processors here, but are actual card networks allowed to charge higher interchange on their ‘premium’ tiers vs. lower tiers (Visa traditional vs. signature)? Or do they all charge the same interchange regardless of tier?

  • Jonathan

    Given that Visa, MC, and most others have rewards tiers, is that outside of the tiered vs. interchange+ argument? I know we are talking about processors here, but are actual card networks allowed to charge higher interchange on their ‘premium’ tiers vs. lower tiers (Visa traditional vs. signature)? Or do they all charge the same interchange regardless of tier?

  • Jonathan

    Given that Visa, MC, and most others have rewards tiers, is that outside of the tiered vs. interchange+ argument? I know we are talking about processors here, but are actual card networks allowed to charge higher interchange on their ‘premium’ tiers vs. lower tiers (Visa traditional vs. signature)? Or do they all charge the same interchange regardless of tier?

  • http://thesituationreport.tumblr.com Dax Bermudez

    This article is full of errors and omissions. For example, STAR is not owned by Visa, it is owned by First Data, one of the largest acquirers in the US. Interchange fees are not set by the payment networks, Visa and MasterCard, interchange fees are actually set by the card issuers. Visa and MasterCard are responsible for settling the interchange fees between the issuer and acquirer.

    • Rob Leighton

      I worked for both Visa and MC, they set the interchange rates.

  • http://thesituationreport.tumblr.com Dax Bermudez

    This article is full of errors and omissions. For example, STAR is not owned by Visa, it is owned by First Data, one of the largest acquirers in the US. Interchange fees are not set by the payment networks, Visa and MasterCard, interchange fees are actually set by the card issuers. Visa and MasterCard are responsible for settling the interchange fees between the issuer and acquirer.

  • Glenn

    It did not nor will it pass any savings to the consumer…it is a cost of doing business.

  • Glenn

    It did not nor will it pass any savings to the consumer…it is a cost of doing business.