March Madness 2014: How Much are College Basketball Players Worth?

shutterstock_125328899

by on March 12, 2014

Get your brackets ready: March Madness is right around the corner, which means everyone in your office or at your dorm is about to become an expert on college basketball. But while everybody is discussing tournament seeds and zone defenses, we at NerdWallet wanted to examine the players’ financial values to their schools.

It’s no secret that the NCAA and its member colleges and universities reap huge revenues from the annual men’s basketball tournament, while imposing rules that limit player compensation primarily to the athletic scholarship their schools gave them. Indeed, the issue of whether student-athletes should be paid for the value they create is hotly debated.

In advance of this year’s tournament, NerdWallet took a look at how much college basketball players are actually worth to their respective schools. We’re not advocating that student-athletes be paid—this is a complicated subject with arguments to be made on both sides. We simply wanted to explore how much value they bring to their colleges.

To do this, we applied a revenue-sharing model similar to the one in place in the NBA, where at least 49% of the league’s revenue goes to players in the form of the salary paid them by their team. We looked at the Associated Press’ ranking of the top 25 men’s college basketball teams in the nation as of March 9, and applied the NBA model to the revenue earned by each team—through TV deals, ticket sales, merchandising and more—in 2012-13. The average player value at each school was calculated by dividing the player revenue total (49% of each team’s total revenue) by the number of players on a roster.

The average player on a top 25 team is worth $476,957. For perspective, that figure is just below this season’s minimum salary in the NBA.

Check out the average player values for each of the top 25 teams in the following table:

Average Player Values at Top 25 Teams (as of 3/9/14)

Rank School Total Team Revenue Projected Total Player Revenue Avg. Player Value
1 Florida $13,393,910 $6,563,016 $468,787
2 Wichita St. $5,369,577 $2,631,093 $219,258
3 Arizona $24,937,572 $12,219,410 $763,713
4 Duke $25,735,093 $12,610,196 $900,728
5 Virginia $7,659,156 $3,752,986 $250,199
6 Villanova $8,619,702 $4,223,654 $324,896
7 Syracuse $26,039,030 $12,759,125 $911,366
8 Kansas $16,412,415 $8,042,083 $502,630
9 Wisconsin $19,225,982 $9,420,731 $724,672
10 San Diego St. $6,498,920 $3,184,471 $212,298
11 Louisville $42,398,758 $20,775,391 $1,483,957
12 Michigan $14,799,440 $7,251,726 $517,980
13 Creighton $5,550,277 $2,719,636 $194,260
14 North Carolina $19,632,779 $9,620,062 $641,337
15 Cincinnati $6,835,459 $3,349,375 $257,644
16 Iowa St. $8,609,008 $4,218,414 $351,534
17 Saint Louis $3,309,395 $1,621,604 $115,829
18 SMU $6,582,998 $3,225,669 $230,405
19 Connecticut $7,293,895 $3,574,009 $238,267
20 Memphis $8,708,694 $4,267,260 $304,804
21 New Mexico $5,771,940 $2,828,251 $202,018
22 Michigan St. $18,502,472 $9,066,211 $566,638
23 Oklahoma $8,380,083 $4,106,241 $293,303
24 Iowa $10,135,412 $4,966,352 $331,090
25 Kentucky $23,201,795 $11,368,880 $874,529

The average player values as listed in the table above assess how much players would be worth at each of the 25 schools under a revenue-sharing model similar to that of the NBA. Diving further into the true value provided by specific players, we attempted to measure how one’s on-court performance would affect his monetary worth under the adopted revenue model.

To define how much a player contributes to his team’s success, we used win shares—an estimate, using offensive and defensive statistics, of how much a player contributed to the team’s success. (Click here for more information on how win shares are calculated.)

We measured how valuable a player is to his team by calculating his win shares as a percentage of his team’s total wins. We then crunched the numbers to apply that percentage to a team’s projected player revenue to estimate how much each player on a roster would earn based on his win shares. In this scenario, players are essentially being paid for how well they’ve performed this season.

Of course, it’s important to note that there are several limitations to this method of assessing player value. First and foremost, statistics like win shares are not the only measure of a player’s value. Second, most teams would earn significant revenue regardless of the names on the roster. For example, the Duke basketball team would likely generate substantial revenue even if star freshman Jabari Parker—likely to be a top pick in the 2014 NBA draft—weren’t suiting up for them.

However, win shares is a good representation of a player’s contribution to his team, and our analysis here assigns salary figures based on performance and relative value.

The following graph shows the highest player value and the average player value at each of the top five schools in the March 9 AP rankings:


Check out our video at the bottom of the page.

The highest-value player at each school is listed, along with his worth. Michael Frazier II has the most win shares for No. 1-ranked Florida and is therefore projected to have the highest player value on his team—just shy of $1.2 million.

Meanwhile, last year’s NCAA tournament darling, Wichita State, is undefeated and ranked No. 2 in the country. The team’s total revenue, however, is much smaller than that of most of the other schools, so their most valuable player, Fred Van Vleet, is worth just $556,282.

It’s not too surprising that Parker holds the highest value of all players among the top five teams. Duke is a perennial powerhouse, and Parker is one of the best freshmen in the country and a player NBA teams have been eyeing for years.

A few other freshmen whose teams aren’t included in the graph above also are worth a great deal of money, according to the numbers. Kansas has two star freshmen who would be at the top of NBA teams’ wish lists if they declare for the 2014 draft: Andrew Wiggins and Joel Embiid. Wiggins is worth some $1.5 million for  Kansas, while Embiid is projected to be worth about $1.2 million.

Kentucky’s Julius Randle is another freshman destined for the NBA. Although his team has struggled to live up to preseason expectations, Randle has played well for the Wildcats and his strong win shares lead to a valuation of $2.3 million. (For reference, under the NBA’s collective bargaining agreement, the first five players chosen in the 2014 draft will make between $3 million and $4.6 million in their rookie season.)

Given the amount of money colleges and the NCAA generate from sports, do you think student athletes should be paid? Or is the value of a free education through scholarships enough of a compensation? Vote in our poll:

Video: How Much Are College Basketball Players Worth?

)

Team revenue data were obtained from the U.S. Department of Education. Roster information and statistics were obtained from Sports-Reference.com. 

NCAA basketball image from Shutterstock

Stay informed about the world of finance
Subscribe to our weekly financial news digest!
We want to hear from you and encourage a lively discussion among our users. Please help us keep our site clean and safe by following our posting guidelines, and avoid disclosing personal or sensitive information such as bank account or phone numbers. Any comments posted under NerdWallet's official account are not reviewed or endorsed by representatives of financial institutions affiliated with the reviewed products, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
  • http://jimshook.tumblr.com/ Jim Shook

    Very interesting :) Certainly puts the “but they get a scholarship” argument (worth ~$30k a year?) to shame.

  • SavingFreak

    It isn’t just the scholarships they get. They get coached by top level coaches, have trainers and top of the line equipment to build their bodies. Don’t forget access to nutritionists and tutors. For the very few that go on to professional sports careers they are receiving way more than just the scholarship because of all this training. This does not take into account the exposure they get. Their ability to market themselves right out of college is greatly affected by being a part of the college atmosphere. Tim Tebow isn’t even playing p

    For those that do not go on to be sports professionals that have a huge network of graduates who have fond memories of these peoples playing days that are willing to advance their career much faster than the average graduate.

    Anyone who plays their cards right out of a major college sport should be put in an amazing position for success. I think they get way more than what the school is receiving in revenue.

  • cristian potter

    This isn’t profit, it’s revenue, so the numbers are inflated. Also, this is only the 25 best teams in the country. If you include all the teams, that average will drop like a rock.