Medical Necessity: Filing Successful Appeals

Health
You can trust that we maintain strict editorial integrity in our writing and assessments; however, we receive compensation when you click on links to products from our partners and get approved. Here's how we make money.

By Martine Brousse

Learn more about Martine on NerdWallet’s Ask an Advisor

As noted in an earlier article, “medical necessity” takes on diverse meanings, based on who claims it.

Eventually the final word on whether a service is medically necessary rests with your insurance, its guidelines, the terms of your health policy and the documentation supporting your claim.

Here are some tips to help you conquer those hard-to-win appeals.

1. Standard medical practice appeal

In general, you (and your physician) must show that the normal, well-established standard of care has been followed. In a nutshell, you have been prescribed the gentler, cheaper, usual course of treatment, and it is not working.

Let’s say your prescription is brand-name, and over-the-counter alternatives are available. You are liable for a higher or total share of cost when purchasing it. Medical necessity would be justified if the OTC or generic versions had been tried over a certain amount of time, resulting in no improvements, a worsening of the condition, a serious side effect, or were counter-indicated.

When a surgical or invasive intervention is recommended, proving medical necessity requires records that show prior conservative, pharmaceutical or noninvasive therapies have been tried and are no longer or never were effective.

2. Insurance guidelines appeal

This appeal will be more difficult to win, but all hope is not lost. Because the terms of a contract are at play, the room to maneuver is tight.

Medical necessity would be established if conservative measures have been used and become ineffective to the point of causing irreparable damage to your health. Detailed explanations of the negative impact on your daily life, professional activities and/or your mental or emotional state if the prescribed treatment were not administered must be presented.

Let us say that you have intense back pain due to an old injury. Your policy will not cover surgery since your condition is neither acute nor hazardous to your life. It will cover pain management modalities, physical therapy and supplies such as a brace.

Exposing potential risks (addiction to pain pills), reduced quality of life (loss of mobility), inability to do your job (can’t sit or drive) or onset of new related conditions (depression) would have a chance of success. The medical records would need to show clearly unusual and serious circumstances justifying the prescribed approach.

3. FDA-based appeal

We are now entering a world where cooperation from your physician is indispensable.

If your treatment has been denied as “off-label” (not approved by the FDA) or inappropriate for your diagnosis, you are unlikely to win an appeal unless highly technical clinical documentation is presented. Many specialized sources in the U.S. are only available to physicians, and looking for supportive information elsewhere will test your research and linguistic skills.

If a prescribed treatment has a proven and effective off-label use abroad, in U.S. drug trials (at least stage II) or as part of peer-reviewed studies, it might be up for consideration. If literature supporting the physician’s decision has been published in medical journals, can be located from reputable sources or is listed in the drug NCCN compendia (the “bible of medications”), your insurance may be convinced to cover it.

Your physician must have the justification and be ready to hand over details, articles and research papers. His reasoning, supported by facts, should be extensively detailed in the medical records, since it is out of established and standard guidelines. If not, ask yourself: On what medical grounds was the treatment prescribed?

This type of appeal is rarely undertaken by patients, due to the complex nature of the evidence and the restricted access to resources.

In conclusion

Records from other physicians, demonstrated impact, detailed past treatments and their results should be on file in your chart. The Medicare rule for payment is “If it is not in the medical records, it did not happen.” Every other insurance provider follows this reasoning. Unless a member of the medical profession noted it, or unless you have written proof, asserting it means little. Old explanations of benefits would do, as would a history print-out from a pharmacy. A letter from someone in the office or a letter that’s unsigned by the physician has no value.

Remember: Filing an appeal requires two things. You must state exactly why a claim should be reprocessed or a denial overturned, and you must prove your point with as much relevant, legitimate documentation as you can get.